Skip to main content

I'm Confused

Confusion is not an unusual state for me, but this morning's bout relates to this article.

A young seminary student has been convicted of aiding illegal aliens and littering, and his punishment is 300 hours of community service and a year of probation. Did he smuggle a truck-load of illegals over the border and try to sell them into slavery? Did he buy one or two to keep as his own indentured servants? No, he left water bottles for them in a national wildlife refuge because when people cross the border by foot, as most of them do, and walk hundreds of miles through the desert, they quite often die of dehydration.

The federal prosecutor said these actions "are not about humanitarian efforts, but about protesting the immigration policies of the United States, and aiding those that enter illegally into the United States."

If the group the student littered on behalf of had made a spectacle of themselves when he left the bottles, that would be a protest. What this guy did instead was to quietly leave water to help keep people from dying. An officer from the refuge said water bottles have been left all over the park.

This same officer said he has met with members of this humanitarian group to work out ways to leave water for illegal immigrants without putting plastic bottles out in the open—his concern is that the plastic bottles pose a threat to wildlife.

This is what confuses me. A private citizen left water as an act of kindness, and since this citizen is a seminary student, I assume he believes what he did was a godly act, something Jesus might have done. His sentence was manageable, but prosecutors actually wanted five years probation and a $5,000 fine. Yet a federal employee can openly state he is helping to work out ways to leave water for illegal immigrants without causing harm to wildlife and even said he recognizes this is something the humanitarians have to do. So where are the charges against this man and the other park employees who are working with the humanitarians?

While covering a health care reform meeting with an Ohio senator for Small Town Newspaper, I watched my fellow community members shout out about not paying for the health care of illegal immigrants. Round 'em up and ship 'em back, they yelled. When the senator snapped back and asked if these angry people wanted us to reject health care for a human being who is bleeding or even dying just because he isn't a citizens, most of the people backed down. I don't know if that's because they suddenly realized they were talking about human beings of if they just didn't want to be seen as so coarse and heartless in public, but they didn't seem to care either way if these illegals live or die. And based on the context of the meeting, it was all about money.

These protesting business leaders and Small Town residents wanted to hang on to their money and were basically declaring their life to be more financially valuable than those of people who came here illegally. It's almost as if they were forming a death panel or something. Given the other things they were protesting, their reaction to the question of health care for illegal immigrants confuses me, too.

Comments

kyle@sift said…
Ah, the death of common sense. Remember Robyn, these small town people also think Sarah Palin is a genius. They would hang you from the nearest stink elm tree if they knew you are actually HELPING immigrants learn to speak English.
dive said…
It's a sick and greedy world, Robyn.

Kyle's right; you have some scary people in Small Town, living in wilful ignorance.

I am so glad I live in my Socialist Nightmare with my lovely free healthcare.
What a very crazy thing. Many of those protesters were probably wearing "WWJD" bracelets. The hypocrisy is staggering.

I replied to your question at The Women's Colony in the comments. Thanks for reading.

Popular posts from this blog

No More Mr. Nice Guy

It's good to be a nice person--to say nice things, to do nice things, to write nice things--but I declare an end to the use of the word nice. Nice is what you say when you can't think of any other adjective. Someone shows you a picture of their back yard--that's nice. Someone tells you about their afternoon adventure--that's nice. Or someone describes their childhood in great detail and sometimes with painstaking effort--that's nice. It's a lazy word, and it's non-descriptive. Nice is like mashed potatoes with noodles and chicken gravy all in a big pile on one plate with some canned corn for garnish. Everything is the same color and texture and base substance--starch (this is a favorite Amish dish). Nice is like a partly cloudy day in April when outside feels like inside, and you can't tell a difference between the lighting and the temperature of your living room and the lighting and temperature of your front yard. Nice is a glass of lukewarm water. ...

Long Live Anita Bowser

You know I occasionally check my hometown newspaper's website to scan the obituaries (morbid, I know, but I'm at that age). Over this past weekend, I read the obituary of Indiana State Senator Anita Bowser . She was a noted Democrat who championed causes protecting the neediest in the state's population. She was respected on both sides of the aisle for her intelligence and plain and outspoken approach to law making. The picture on her senate page is lovely. I remember none of those things about Anita Bowser . My first year or so in college was spent at a branch of Purdue University, and in the early 80s, Anita was a political science professor. She taught my American Government class my freshman year, and she was a mess. Somewhere in my old text book, I have a sketch of her drawn on a particularly dull day in class--her hose sagged at her ankles, her slip showed at least half an inch all the way around, her hair had been slept on but not brushed, and her bright red lip stic...

My Sitemeter is All Bloated and Not Quite Itself

I'm tempted to let it sit on the couch with its feet curled up under a blanket, a hot cup of coffee in hand, a block of cherry almond bark Chocolove within reach, and An Affair to Remember spinning in the DVD player. I'm one of those obsessive bloggers, the kind who checks her sitemeter as often as possible throughout the day, the kind who gauges the quality of her writing by the number of readers who regularly stop by. I've become less interested in the overall number of hits and more interested in the number of repeat hits. The return visitors are the ones I long for. When my sitemeter reads forty at the end of the day, and the majority of those hits are webpals who have conversed, I'm happy. Forty may seem low to many of you, but I've only been at this since August. To me, forty is a jackpot. A few days ago, I sat down at my laptop and discovered a number somewhere in the eighties. Eighties! Yippee! Yeeha ! Hoo-rah ! I've been discovered by the webworld , o...