Skip to main content

I'm Confused

Confusion is not an unusual state for me, but this morning's bout relates to this article.

A young seminary student has been convicted of aiding illegal aliens and littering, and his punishment is 300 hours of community service and a year of probation. Did he smuggle a truck-load of illegals over the border and try to sell them into slavery? Did he buy one or two to keep as his own indentured servants? No, he left water bottles for them in a national wildlife refuge because when people cross the border by foot, as most of them do, and walk hundreds of miles through the desert, they quite often die of dehydration.

The federal prosecutor said these actions "are not about humanitarian efforts, but about protesting the immigration policies of the United States, and aiding those that enter illegally into the United States."

If the group the student littered on behalf of had made a spectacle of themselves when he left the bottles, that would be a protest. What this guy did instead was to quietly leave water to help keep people from dying. An officer from the refuge said water bottles have been left all over the park.

This same officer said he has met with members of this humanitarian group to work out ways to leave water for illegal immigrants without putting plastic bottles out in the open—his concern is that the plastic bottles pose a threat to wildlife.

This is what confuses me. A private citizen left water as an act of kindness, and since this citizen is a seminary student, I assume he believes what he did was a godly act, something Jesus might have done. His sentence was manageable, but prosecutors actually wanted five years probation and a $5,000 fine. Yet a federal employee can openly state he is helping to work out ways to leave water for illegal immigrants without causing harm to wildlife and even said he recognizes this is something the humanitarians have to do. So where are the charges against this man and the other park employees who are working with the humanitarians?

While covering a health care reform meeting with an Ohio senator for Small Town Newspaper, I watched my fellow community members shout out about not paying for the health care of illegal immigrants. Round 'em up and ship 'em back, they yelled. When the senator snapped back and asked if these angry people wanted us to reject health care for a human being who is bleeding or even dying just because he isn't a citizens, most of the people backed down. I don't know if that's because they suddenly realized they were talking about human beings of if they just didn't want to be seen as so coarse and heartless in public, but they didn't seem to care either way if these illegals live or die. And based on the context of the meeting, it was all about money.

These protesting business leaders and Small Town residents wanted to hang on to their money and were basically declaring their life to be more financially valuable than those of people who came here illegally. It's almost as if they were forming a death panel or something. Given the other things they were protesting, their reaction to the question of health care for illegal immigrants confuses me, too.

Comments

kyle@sift said…
Ah, the death of common sense. Remember Robyn, these small town people also think Sarah Palin is a genius. They would hang you from the nearest stink elm tree if they knew you are actually HELPING immigrants learn to speak English.
dive said…
It's a sick and greedy world, Robyn.

Kyle's right; you have some scary people in Small Town, living in wilful ignorance.

I am so glad I live in my Socialist Nightmare with my lovely free healthcare.
What a very crazy thing. Many of those protesters were probably wearing "WWJD" bracelets. The hypocrisy is staggering.

I replied to your question at The Women's Colony in the comments. Thanks for reading.

Popular posts from this blog

Happy Birthday To...

Pope Leo IX (the Pope) JCF Bach (German composer) Jane Russell (of Gentlemen Prefer Blonds fame) Daniel Carter Beard (founder of the Boy Scouts of America) Jean-Paul Sartre (French philosopher) Maureen Stapleton (Academy Award winning actress) Mariette Hartley (who?) Prince William of Wales (the prince) but most importantly, HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 45 years ago today, I was born in Alabama in a small town on the banks of the Tennessee River. Yesterday, someone asked me if my family has any birthday traditions. The answer is no. My family never cared very much, but I do remember a few birthday highlights. I was given a birthday party in the back yard when I was ten years old. Two years later, my sister got married on my birthday, so I was just a bit overlooked, although I did get a stuffed animal--it was a white Yorkshire terrier with an AM radio in its stomach. When I turned 20, a different sister took me to an outdoor performance of Dvorak's New World Sympho...

Right Brain Dominant

I am reading A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future , by Daniel H. Pink. I wouldn't have chosen this book had I been book hunting because I lean toward fiction—it was a gift from someone who, like me, is right-brain dominate. I haven't gotten very far, just far enough to learn that in Hippocrates' day, the left side of the brain was considered the true source of thought, the thing that separated us from the animals and made us human. It was the source of reason and logic. The right side was considered a useless left over, a parasite. Now we know that both sides of our brains are equally important and equally involved in our daily thoughts and functions. But some of us do seem to be governed by one side more strongly than the other. Me, sometimes I think the left side of my brain has completely atrophied, that the right side governs everything. But I am learning that I don't give that other side enough credit, that logical mathy side. As I read on ab...

Everybody Needs A Little Crème Brûlée

I went out to dinner with some friends the other evening and ordered crème brûlée for dessert. It was lovely—crispy sugar crust and creamy custard underneath. I'm a bit of crème brûlée fan and order it more often than I order any other restaurant dessert, which is not to say I always order dessert—only now and then. On my way home, I remembered I had a crème brûlée kit at home with ramekins, a torch, and a basic recipe. I love the torch. So, now I have made my favorite dessert at home, and I recommend that everyone have crème brûlée. It makes the world better. I used the recipe on the box, which was simple and basic. My only suggestion for improvement is to use less sugar for the caramelized crust. It was so thick, it was like chipping away at glass. An ice pick would have come in handy, or a diamond. Other recipes suggest 1/4 cup to be divided among six ramekins, making just over 1 tablespoon per serving. Crème Brûlée serves 4 1 cup heavy cream 2 extra large egg yolks (I used 3 re...