Skip to main content

Flourless Brownies—Worth Trying Again

I like chocolate. I mean, I really like chocolate. The darker the better. Something just short of unsweetened sounds just about right to me. I have a great recipe for flourless chocolate cake that I make a few times a year, and everyone loves it. No. 1 invited a friend over for dinner one night when I was serving the stuff, and the kid declared it the best dessert he'd ever tasted. Maybe he was being a polite guest, or maybe it's just that good.

Either way, when I ran across a recipe for flourless brownies the other day, I couldn't wait to give it a try. How could it be bad? Well, the recipe aside, sometimes things go wrong in the kitchen. For starters, the recipe came from The Guardian, so it calls for ingredients measured by grams. I have no way to measure grams, so I used an online converter to change that to cups, but isn't a gram a measure for weight, whereas a cup is a measure for volume? I might be wrong about that, but it seems to me you can't simply convert grams into measuring-cup terms.

I used the measurements suggested by the converter anyway. I put the batter into a 20cm-square pan, which I think is an 8x8, and with the oven set at 160˚C, which I think is something like 375˚F. I set the timer for the recommended 35 minutes and went downstairs into my office where I can't hear the timer. I know that, so I looked at the clock and told myself to get back upstairs in time. But did I forget? Of course I did. I started working on something else and lost all track of time, and 50 minutes later, I smelled brownies. I ran upstairs yelling, "Oh, crap. Oh, crap. Oh, crap." I took the pan out of the oven and frowned at the blackened edges, but I didn't lose hope. I let the stuff cool a little, and I cut it up, and it turns out the brownies weren't really burned at all. It's just some of the ground almonds that coat the pan that got a little over-toasted.

So, here is the recipe as I found it in The Guardian with my converted measurements in parentheses). Correct me where I'm wrong, if you know, and I'll try this again. And I promise to pay attention to the timer the next time.

Flourless Brownies

175g bittersweet chocolate (6 oz)
90g unsalted butter (6.3 T)
2.5 tablespoons strong coffee
3 large eggs
220g sugar (.957 cup—about a cup)
1/2 teaspoon vanilla extract
125g ground almonds (1/2 cup—I ground them myself in a food processor, and I think they weren't quite ground enough)
1/2 teaspoon baking powder

Preheat over to 160˚C (375˚F). Butter a 20cm-square pan (8x8) and throw in about a heaped tablespoon of the ground almonds and shuffle them around so that the whole of the inside is lightly coated.

Melt the butter and chocolate in the microwave* and stir in coffee.

In a separate bowl, whisk together the eggs and sugar until pail and creamy. Stir in warm chocolate mixture. In another bowl, mix the almonds with the baking powder and then fold into the batter.

Bake for about 35 minutes (or whatever) and let rest for 10 minutes before cutting.

*when melting chocolate in the microwave, start with 40 seconds. Stir the chocolate and heat again for no more than 20 seconds. Stir again to melt the pieces. Heat again for another 20 seconds at a time as necessary. If you try to melt it for any longer, it will burn, and you'll have to start over.

Comments

kyle@sift said…
I like the idea of using ground almonds to coat the pan...and flourless anything sounds great as I don't care to eat much wheat. Perhaps a kitchen scale is in order. I like baking by weight rather than volume for a more consistent result.
savannah said…
i am so sending super nana over her for this recipe! she's started baking and it is spring break, so maybe her years of living in paris will help with the conversions, etc. i might have to try these myself. (btw, check out ina garten's panna cotta and balsamic strawberries. we used vanilla ice cream instead of the panna cotta.) xoxox
Eustacia said…
One more reason to switch to the metric system. I should use this in my speech.

Popular posts from this blog

Happy Birthday To...

Pope Leo IX (the Pope) JCF Bach (German composer) Jane Russell (of Gentlemen Prefer Blonds fame) Daniel Carter Beard (founder of the Boy Scouts of America) Jean-Paul Sartre (French philosopher) Maureen Stapleton (Academy Award winning actress) Mariette Hartley (who?) Prince William of Wales (the prince) but most importantly, HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 45 years ago today, I was born in Alabama in a small town on the banks of the Tennessee River. Yesterday, someone asked me if my family has any birthday traditions. The answer is no. My family never cared very much, but I do remember a few birthday highlights. I was given a birthday party in the back yard when I was ten years old. Two years later, my sister got married on my birthday, so I was just a bit overlooked, although I did get a stuffed animal--it was a white Yorkshire terrier with an AM radio in its stomach. When I turned 20, a different sister took me to an outdoor performance of Dvorak's New World Sympho...

Everybody Needs A Little Crème Brûlée

I went out to dinner with some friends the other evening and ordered crème brûlée for dessert. It was lovely—crispy sugar crust and creamy custard underneath. I'm a bit of crème brûlée fan and order it more often than I order any other restaurant dessert, which is not to say I always order dessert—only now and then. On my way home, I remembered I had a crème brûlée kit at home with ramekins, a torch, and a basic recipe. I love the torch. So, now I have made my favorite dessert at home, and I recommend that everyone have crème brûlée. It makes the world better. I used the recipe on the box, which was simple and basic. My only suggestion for improvement is to use less sugar for the caramelized crust. It was so thick, it was like chipping away at glass. An ice pick would have come in handy, or a diamond. Other recipes suggest 1/4 cup to be divided among six ramekins, making just over 1 tablespoon per serving. Crème Brûlée serves 4 1 cup heavy cream 2 extra large egg yolks (I used 3 re...

Right Brain Dominant

I am reading A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future , by Daniel H. Pink. I wouldn't have chosen this book had I been book hunting because I lean toward fiction—it was a gift from someone who, like me, is right-brain dominate. I haven't gotten very far, just far enough to learn that in Hippocrates' day, the left side of the brain was considered the true source of thought, the thing that separated us from the animals and made us human. It was the source of reason and logic. The right side was considered a useless left over, a parasite. Now we know that both sides of our brains are equally important and equally involved in our daily thoughts and functions. But some of us do seem to be governed by one side more strongly than the other. Me, sometimes I think the left side of my brain has completely atrophied, that the right side governs everything. But I am learning that I don't give that other side enough credit, that logical mathy side. As I read on ab...